| REPORT - STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS UNMET NEEDS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH & NUTRITION |
|
|
|
Primary Health Care Services |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Left
to Right : Shri L. R. Thanga, DIG Forest, Shri A. K. Singh, Director
(Sanitation), Ministry of Rural Development, Dr. Bindeshwar Pathak,
Founder, Sulabh International.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The primary health care infrastructure provides the first level of contact between the population and health care providers. Realising the importance of the primary health care infrastructure in delivery of health services, States, Centre and several agencies simultaneously started creating primary health care infrastructure and manpower. This has resulted in substantial amount of duplication of the infrastructure and manpower; inspite of this there are under served areas where the need for the health services is very great. The problem is mainly one of inequitable distribution of existing institutions and manpower as well as poor functional status due to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Over and above all these there are the voluntary organizations and the private sector providing heath care. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The statewise information with regard to the government hospitals and dispensaries in modern system of medicine and ISM&H, rural primary health care infrastructure as well as the institutions being maintained by the Department of Family Welfare for providing family welfare services is given at Annexure-I. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is important to take into account all these before estimating the gaps in infrastructure and manpower. It is possible to achieve substantial improvement in coverage and quality of health services by appropriately restructuring the existing infrastructure making them responsible for health care for the population in a defined in geographic area. Similarly substantial proportion of the manpower problems can be sorted out by appropriate reorientation and re-deployment of existing manpower. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
At the national level the total number of functional Sub centres and the PHCs nearly meets the set norms (one sub-centre for 3000-5000 population, one Primary Health Centre for 20,000-30,000 population) for the population in 1991. The requirement of primary health care infrastructure (as of 1991 population) and the current status of primary health care infrastructure and manpower in rural areas is given in Table I. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table
I - Rural Primary Health Care Infrastructure/Manpower
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source:- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Even though a vast infrastructure has been created, it is functioning sub-optimally. The factors responsible for the sub-optimal functioning of rural Primary Health Care Institutions are: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In spite of the fact that the norms for creation of infrastructure and manpower are similar throughout the country, there are substantial differences between States and between districts in the same state in the availability and utilization of health care services and health indices of the population. Attempts are being made to minimise these gaps. It is a matter of concern that many of the districts with poor health indices do not have adequate health infrastructure. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In addition to the classical PHC, States have a large no. of rural hospitals and dispensaries in modem system of medicine and ISM&H. In addition to CHCs there are block level PHCs, Taluk Hospitals, Sub Divisional Hospitals & Sub District Post Partum Centres. Earmarked funds under BMS could be utilized for completing the restructuring and strengthening of these hospitals/dispensaries. Several states have initiated action to improve access to primary health care services. Some of the ongoing initiatives to improve access to Primary Health Care include: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently, in addition to funding through the earmarked basic minimum services in the State Plan Budget, funding from Additional Central Assistance under PMGY externally assisted projects for strengthening health infrastructure and centrally sponsored programmes in Health and Family Welfare provide funding for strengthening infrastructure, covering critical gaps in manpower, equipment, consumable and drugs. Under PMGY, an allocation of Rs.2500 crores has been provided to the States for 5 sectors comprising primary health, primary education, shelter, drinking water and nutrition. A minimum of 15% of this allocation is to be spent by the States on each of the five sectors. However, the states do have the flexibility to determine the utilization of the remaining 25% of funds. Funds from PMGY under primary health care may be utilized for strengthening of existing and functioning primary health care institutions (50%) by procurement of drugs and essential consumables and contingency for travel costs for ANMs, repair of essential equipment, repair/replacement of furniture and 50% for strengthening repair and maintenance of infrastructure in sub-centre, PHC and CHC (priority will be given to ensure portable water supply, adequate toilet facilities and waste management). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poor maintenance and consequent deterioration of the buildings and equipment has been a major factor responsible for sub-optimal functioning. Many States are unable to provide funds for these critical activities from the Non Plan funds. Under the Reproductive and Child Health Care Programme, Rs. 10 lakh per district has been released to the States for minor repair and maintenance of buildings, especially for operation theatre, labour rooms and for improvements in water and electric supply. Rs. 10 lakh per CHC/district hospital is also released to all States for major civil works to improve facilities for essential obstetric services through construction/repair of operation theatre, labour rooms or to provide/improve facilities for water/electric supply in PHCs, CHCs & district hospitals. A total of Rs. 49 crores for minor civil works and Rs. 21 crores has been released in the Ninth Plan upto 1998-99. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The number of PHC doctors at the national level exceeds the requirement as per the norms. However, there are marked differences in their distribution. The PHCs without doctors and paraprofessionals are mostly located in remote areas where health care facilities provided by the voluntary or private sector is also limited. Some of the innovative approaches to fill the vacancies in under-served areas currently being tried in some States include local recruitment of doctors, if necessary on part-time basis; adoption of a village/PHC/district by industrial establishments, cooperatives, self-help groups and charitable institutions; permitting local practitioners to pay a rental and practice in the PHCs after OPD hours. The usefulness of these approaches is being assessed. Substantial proportion of specialist posts even in functional CHCs are vacant, hence these CHCs are unable to function as First Referral Units (FRUs). It is necessary to ensure that specialists are available in the CHCs so that referral patients and those requiring emergency care receive the treatment they need. There are gaps in some of the critical para professional personnel such as the lab technicians and male multi purpose workers. Efforts are under way to provide the required posts of lab technicians under various CSS to fill the gap within this plan period. The number of sanctioned posts of male multi-purpose workers is only half the number required. This has been cited as one of the major factors responsible for the sub-optimal performance in health sector programmes. There are large numbers of male-workers employed in the malaria, leprosy and TB Control programmes. They have to be given appropriate retraining and skill upgradation, redeployment as male multipurpose workers and given the responsibility of looking after all health and family welfare programmes in their sub-centre area. Funds for these activities are available under States Annual Plan Health Sector Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Outlays, for BMS and Externally Aided Projects; some of the states have state specific Externally Assisted Projects to improve primary health care infrastructure/manpower. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nearly 30% of India's population lives in urban areas. There is either non - availability or substantial under utilization of available primary care facilities along with an over-crowding at secondary and tertiary care centres. There is a plethora of personnel and beds in public, private, voluntary agencies but these are not geographically linked with clear assignment of responsibilities or referral linkages. The innate difficulty in restructuring of infrastructure is that there are multiple funding agencies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nagar Palikas, State Govts., Central Ministries and EAPs provide funding for building upgradation and re-structuring urban primary health care infrastructure and establishing effective linkages. Earmarked funds under BMS and the ACA for BMS, funds from the urban RCH project and from urban component of IPP project can be utilized for the development of urban primary health care. Planning Commission has provided an ACA of Rs. 1.5 crores for strengthening of urban health care services in Municipal Council, Malgaon, Nasik district, Maharashtra in Annual Plan 1999-2000. Though there are several small success stories, the progress in the overall task of restructuring, reorganising the urban primary health care linked to secondary and tertiary care and appropriate retraining and redeployment of personnel has been very slow. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The population coverage norms for primary health care institutions is 1 PHC per 20,000 population, 1 SC for 3000 population in hilly/tribal areas as against 1 PHC per 30,000 population and 1 SC for 5000 population for the general rural population, in view of distances and sparse population. There are at present 20,799 SCs, 3,306 PHCs and 469 CHCs in tribal areas in addition there are 1122 Allopathic dispensaries, 120 Allopathic hospitals, 78 Allopathic mobile clinics, 1106 Ayurvedic dispensaries, 24 Ayurvedic hospitals, 251 Homeopathic dispensaries, 28 Homeopathic hospitals, 42 Unani dispensaries, 7 Siddha dispensaries functioning in tribal areas. Similarly, 16,845 SCs, 5987 PHCs & 373 CHCs have been established in Scheduled Caste Basties/Villages having 20% or more SC population; another 980 Allopathic dispensaries, 1042 Ayurvedic dispensaries, 480 Homeopathic dispensaries and 68 Unani/Siddha dispensaries are functioning in schedule caste concentrated areas. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most of the Centrally Sponsored Disease Control Programmes have a focus on tribal areas. Under the NAMP 100 identified districts that are predominantly tribal in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa & Rajasthan are covered. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Several states have had successful experiments in improving primary health care to Tribals: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The problems with such experiments are that the: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A new scheme titled Medical Care for Remote and Marginalised Tribal and Nomadic Communities has been initiated in the Ninth Plan. Under this scheme, a research project on 'Intervention Programme for Nutritional Anemia and Haemoglobinopathies amongst some primitive tribal population of India' has been initiated by ICMR. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The secondary health care infrastructure at the district hospitals and urban hospitals are currently taking care of the primary health care needs of the population in the city/town in which it is located and also act as secondary care centres; this inevitably leads to overcrowding and under utilization of the specialized services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strengthening secondary health care services is an identified priority in the Ninth Plan. In addition to the provision of funds from State Plan several States have been seeking External Assistance to build up FRU/District Hospitals. So far six states have initiated such projects with external assistance from World Bank. The States have initiated construction works, procurement of equipments increased availability of ambulances, drugs; improvement in services following training to improve skills in clinical management, attitudes and behaviour of health care providers reduction in vacancies and mismatches in health personnel/infrastructure and improvement in Hospital Waste Management, disease surveillance and response system have been reported. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All the six States have attempted introduction of user charges for diagnostics and therapeutics from people above the poverty line. Initial problems have been sorted out. Some States are still unable to ensure retention of collected charges in the same institute. This problem need be speedily resolved. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Majority of the tertiary care institutions in the governmental sector lack adequate manpower and facilities to meet the rapidly growing demand for increasingly complex diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. On the other hand, there is overcrowding in tertiary care hospitals due to a lack of a referral system from primary and secondary care levels. There is a need to optimize facilities in the tertiary care centres. The Ninth Plan priorities for tertiary care centres includes provision of funds for capacity building levying user changes to people above poverty line and exploring alternative modalities to meet the growing cost of care. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Several States (e.g. Rajasthan, UP) are trying out innovative schemes to give greater autonomy to these institutions, allowing them to generate resources and utilise them effectively. Some States e.g. Rajasthan and Kerala have been levying user charges and attempting to utilise the funds to improve hospital services. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suggestions for Improvement in the Functioning of Primary Health Care Infrastucture |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is adequate primary health care infrastructure in rural areas. In order to improve the primary health care services, it is important that: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No new infrastructure needs to be created and only existing infrastructure should be strengthened and operationalised. The access to primary health care should be improved and quality of primary health care in urban and rural areas should be enhanced through optimally functioning primary health care system. The following measures are suggested which would help in optimal and efficient functioning of the existing primary health care infrastructure: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The PHCs should function as curative care centres and also provide preventive and promotive health care services. CHCs with 25-30 beds should provide back up curative, referral and inpatient facilities. Specialists from CHCs/ FRUs should visit to PHCs on specified days. Non-overlapping geographical areas should be earmarked for provision of services by PHCs/CHCs/Taluk Hospitals. Civil Surgeons/District Hospital In-charge should be made responsible for developing referral linkages between PHCs/CHCs/Taluk Hospitals functioning in the area. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Availability of medical and para-medical manpower should be improved through contractual appointment of doctors/ para-professionals. Anaestheist should be appointed at FRUs/CHCs on contractual basis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
States must be provided earmarked funding under health sector allocations in Annual Plan proposals for primary health care services under Rural/urban areas. There is a need to have state specific strategies and within the states district specific strategies especially for backward areas. Over and above the national norms for establishment of infrastructure for providing basic health care facilities the state governments should formulate separate policy/ strategy/ demographic norms for establishment of the infrastructure in the backward areas depending upon their specific requirements. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A number of states have started implementing the Secondary Health System Project for strengthening of the health care infrastructure at the district level. There is an urgent need for making the health care institutions at district level to be self sustainable so that these institutions are able to function in a financially independent way and are also able to provide good quality health care facilities. There is also a need to define the role of public sector hospitals. The district level hospitals and other institutions providing referral back-up need to be restructured and the state governments may be given flexibility to evolve their own strategies for making these institutions self- sustainable. The States must introduce user charges for the persons who can afford to pay. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The district should have specialists in epidemiology/ public health/bio-statistics so that monitoring of ongoing health/family welfare programmes through Health Management Information System (HMIS), ensuring appropriate supplies, disease surveillance and responding to the immediate requirements become insult in the public health system. Wherever epidemiologists are not available, the existing clinical specialists should be trained in public health and epidemiology. Planning Commission has provided an additional central assistance for development of a self - sustainable district hospital model and the progress in this effort will be monitored. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suitable programmes under Continuing Medical Education (CME) should be planned for the professional/paraprofessional in public/private/voluntary sector so as to keep them abreast with the latest developments in the field. Suitable policy needs to be developed for the rational use of drugs and the use of only the generic drugs so that cost of drugs becomes affordable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Connectivity of villages with the villages having primary health care facilities should be improved utilizing funds available under PMGY. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ISM&H institutions in rural/remote areas to provide preventive/ promotive services and also health counseling. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A cadre of mid-wife may be formed for better management of maternal and child health activities in the rural areas. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
At the time of Independence the country faced two major nutritional problems - one was the threat of famine and acute starvation due to low agricultural production and lack of appropriate food distribution system. The other was chronic energy deficiency due to poverty, low-literacy, poor access to safe-drinking water, sanitation and health care; these factors led to wide spread prevalence of infections and ill health in children and adults. Kwashiorkor, marasmus, goitre, beriberi, blindness due to Vitamin-A deficiency and anaemia were major public health problems. The country adopted multi - sectoral, multi-pronged strategy to combat the major nutritional problems and to improve nutritional status of the population. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During the last 50 years considerable progress has been achieved. Famines no longer stalk the country. There has been substantial reduction in moderate and severe under nutrition in children and some improvement in nutritional status of all segments of population. Kwashiorkor, marasmus, pellagra, lathyrism, beriberi and blindness due to severe Vitamin-A deficiency have become rare. While much of this change is attributable to improvement in dietary intake, sometimes the changes were unforeseen and incidental to ongoing developmental processes. However, it is a matter of concern that milder forms of chronic energy deficiency and micronutrient deficiencies continue to be widely prevalent in adults and children. The last three decades have witnessed emergence of newer nutritional problems. Unforeseen factors, unleashed by developmental process have brought about changes in environment and dramatic changes in epidemiology of nutrition related disease such as flurosis. There had been major alterations in the life styles and dietary intake especially among urban middle and upper income group population resulting in increasing incidence of obesity in adolescents and adults and increasing risk of non- communicable diseases; under nutrition associated with HIV /AIDS is emerging as a newer public health problem. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The National Population Policy 2000 envisages improvement in the Health and nutritional status of women and children through : |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A review of the current nutrition related public health problems and suggestions regarding remedial measures to be implemented during the Tenth Plan period is given in the following pages | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nutritional Implications of Changing Food Production Patterns |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One of the major achievements in the last fifty years has been the green revolution and self-sufficiency in food production. Food grain production has increased from 50.82 million tons in 1950-51 to 200.88 million tons in 1998-99 (Prov.). It is a matter of concern that while the cereal production has been growing steadily at a rate higher than the population growth rates, the coarse Figure-1 grain and pulse production has not shown a similar increase (Table I Fig 1). There has been a reduction In the per capita availability of pulses (from 60.7 grams per day in 1951 to 34 grams per day in 1996- Fig.-2) and coarse grains. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FOOD PRODUCTION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Major achievement is self sufficiency in food grains in spite of population growth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prevention and management of Chronic Energy Deficiency (CED) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in Dietary Intake and nutritional status | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Currently there is no agency, which carries out nation-wide surveys on an appropriate sample of the population for inter-state comparisons and time trends in intake and nutritional status. The NNMB is the only major source of data on nutrition and related aspects but it covers only ten states viz., Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Orissa, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Of these states also, in the last survey (1996-97), the survey could not be carried out in West Bengal and the coverage was partial in Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Over the last three decades there have been substantial changes in socio- economic status as well as life style of the population. The data from the surveys conducted by the National Nutrition Monitoring Bureau (NNMB) indicate that there has been an increase in energy intake in adults -both men and women over the last three decades (Figure-3). Data from NNMB also indicates that over years there has been some decline in CED and simultaneously an increase in obesity (Fig- 4). It is important to find out the impact of these changes in dietary intake and nutritional status of the population. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It has long been recognized that pregnant and lactating women and preschool children are nutritionally the most vulnerable segments of the population and under-nutrition in them is associated with major health problems. Major causes of CED continue to be inadequate food intake, infections, poor health care. The major initiatives to tackle the problem include poverty alleviation schemes, schemes to improve purchasing power, TPDS to enhance household food availability, ICDS to provide food supplements to pregnant and lactating women and pre-school children. Dietary intake in pregnant and lactating women continues to be lower than the recommended levels. Pregnant and lactating women have been an identified priority group for receiving food supplement through ICDS. However, experiences over the years indicate very few needy at risk pregnant women regularly access and benefit from ICDS food supplements. Effective antenatal care is also not readily available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Low dietary intake in already chronically under-nourished women has adverse effects on health and nutritional status of both the mother and her offspring. There are readily identifiable situations, which result in further deterioration of maternal nutrition and have adverse impact on outcome of pregnancy. Some such situations are: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. Reduction in habitual dietary intake (drought, preharvest season) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. Increase in work (newly inducted manual laborers) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3. Combination of both the above (food for work programmes) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4. Adolescent pregnancy |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5. Pregnancy in a lactating woman |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6. Pregnancy occurring within two years after last delivery. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The community, the health workers and ICDS systems are being sensitized to recognize these at risk groups and respond by appropriate remedial measures to tackle the problem in these groups. It is important that the individual at risk of under nutrition is identified and appropriate steps to improve her nutritional status are initiated by the AWW and ANM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preschool children constitute the most nutritionally vulnerable segment of the population and their nutritional status is considered to be a sensitive indicator of community health and nutrition. India with less than 20% global children accounts for over 40% under nourished children. Over the last two decades there has been some improvement in energy intake and substantial reduction in moderate and severe under nutrition in pre school children (Fig. 5). Though there has not been any change in the intake of green leafy vegetables and other vegetables, there has been substantial decline in prevalence of nutritional deficiency signs (Fig. 6). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FIG
5.0
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interstate Differences in dietary intake, undernutrition and infant mortality |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Low dietary intake due to faulty feeding is the most important cause of under- nutrition. Low birth weight, poor infant feeding practices, infections due to poor sanitation, lack of safe drinking water and poor access to health care are other major factors responsible for under-nutrition in children. There are substantial differences in dietary intake and nutritional status of children among the states. In spite of low dietary intake, prevalence of severe under-nutrition is lower in Kerala because of more equitable distribution of food between income groups and within families and better access to and utilization of health care. In spite of higher average dietary intake, under-nutrition rates are higher in Madhya Pradesh and Orissa because of lack of equitable distribution of food and access to health care (Fig.7). Identification and appropriate nutrition and health intervention among |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FIG
6.0
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
'at risk' groups and in under-nourished children are essential for optimal results. This is currently being attempted in ICDS programme in Orissa. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FIG
7.0
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FIG 8.0 ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Under-nutrition increases susceptibility to infections. Infection aggravates under- nutrition. If uninterrupted this vicious circle could result in death. In most of the states with high under-nutrition the infant mortality is high (Fig.8). In Kerala both severe under- nutrition and IMR are low because of equitable distribution of food and better access to health care. In Maharashtra, IMR is comparatively lower inspite of a high rate of under- nutrition. This may perhaps be due to better access to health care. In spite of high per capita income, dietary intake and access to health care, both under-nutrition and IMR are relatively high in Punjab. Factors responsible for these need to be investigated and remedial measures initiated. It is therefore imperative that state/ district specific situation analysis is done and appropriate health and nutrition programmes are initiated and coordinated to achieve optimal synergy between the two interventions so that there is improvement in nutritional and health status. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One another factor responsible for under-nutrition in childhood is poor intra-familial distribution of food. Studies in CALORIE INTAKE (%) intra-familial distribution of food carried out by NNMB indicated that in over 20% of the families where adults get sufficient food, the pre-school children do not get enough food (Fig. 9). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This problem is inversely related to the maternal education level. Nutrition education has a key role in improving intra-familial distribution of food so that the preschool children get their due share. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FIG 9.0 ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operational strategy during the Ninth Plan to improve health and nutritional status of pre-school children: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nutritional Component of the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ICDS, perhaps the largest of all the food supplementation programmes in the world, was initiated in 1975 with the following objectives:- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The initial geographic focus was on drought-prone areas and blocks with a significant proportion of scheduled caste and scheduled tribe population. In 1975, 33 blocks were covered under ICDS. Over the last two decades the ICDS coverage has progressively increased. As of 1996, 4,200 blocks were covered under ICDS; there are 5,92,571 anganwadis in the country. The number of beneficiaries rose from 5.7 million children and 1.2 million mothers in 1985 to 18.5 million children and 3.7 million mothers in 1996. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There was a major review of the nutrition sector and ICDS programme by the World Bank (WB) and Government of India (GOI) in 1997. The findings were: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The nutrition component of ICDS programme is funded by the State Govt. In addition to ICDS, some states have other supplementary feeding programmes eg. Tamil Nadu -Mid day meal programme. Table-II provides the information on expenditure relating to nutrition in 12 major States. It is obvious that expenditure does not have any correlation with level of under-nutrition or State Domestic Product. States, which have higher prevalence of under-nutrition, are not investing higher amount in food supplementation programme. However, expenditure on supplementary nutrition is not the only critical determinant of level of under-nutrition. Kerala, which is spending very little oh nutrition programmes, has the lowest under-nutrition rates, perhaps due to more equitable distribution of food and effective health care. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Suggestion made by the GOI- WB review group : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The review group recommended: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For ICDS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For Health Sector : |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The State Governments are responsible for funding Nutrition component of ICDS. Inadequacy of funds is one of the major factors responsible for erratic food supply and poor coverage. Outlays and expenditures for food supplementation through ICDS during the 9th plan are given in Annexure-l. Planning Commission reviewed the State Governments' funding of nutrition component of ongoing ICDS programme in 1999. The current norms envisage that funds for feeding 72 beneficiaries are provided to every anganwadi (against the average of about 200 eligible children and women in the community). The programme guidelines are uniform for all blocks. At the national level only 30 million out of the country's 162 million children are covered. The 'covered' children may not be the most needy groups or individuals. There are no guidelines for targeting the available food to the most needy. Planning Commission computed the state- wise requirement of funds as per the existing ICDS guidelines and if supplements were to be given only to women and (0-4) children from BPL families taking into account state specific birth rates (1997) and BPL rates (1994). The gap in funding under these two scenarios was calculated and the data is presented in annexure II & III. It is obvious that under both these scenarios there are huge gaps between required funds and amount actually provided. The State Governments have been requested to initiate steps to fill this critical gap to the extent possible. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||