| Summary
Record of the
Conference on Convergence of Social Sector Programmes
for Population Stabilization
held on 4th October 2001
at Hotel Kanishka, Ashoka Road, New Delhi. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| 1.
The list of Union Ministers, Members of the Planning Commission,
Members of the NCP, Secretaries to the Government of India,
Principal Advisers and Advisers of the Planning Commission and
other distinguished persons who attended the Conference are
given at Annexure-I. |
|
| 2.
Mrs. Krishna Singh, Member Secretary, NCP welcomed the dignitaries
and distinguished personalities present at the meeting and stated
that after the first Conference of the National Commission on
Population (NCP) held in July, 2000, a number of initiatives
were taken to promote inter-sectoral coordination and bring
about a synergy in the policies and programmes of various Departments
of the Government of India and State Governments which are relevant
for reaching the goals set out in the National Population Policy
(NPP) 2000. After the inaugural address by Shri K.C. Pant, Vice-Chairman,
NCP and Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission a presentation
on the present demographic scenario in the country and an overview
of the activities of the NCP would be made which will be followed
by short presentations by the Departments of Elementary Education,
Woman and Child Development, Tribal Affairs and Slums bringing
out the relevance of the programmes of these sectors for achieving
demographic stabilization. Similar presentations will also be
made by the Ministry of Rural Development about the role of
Panchayati Raj Institutions and by the Water Supply Division
of the Planning Commission on drinking water supply and sanitation.
After this, Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi, Hon’ble Minister
for Human Resource Development, Shri Anant Kumar, Hon’ble
Minister for Urban Development and Poverty Alleviation and Shri
Jual Oram, Hon’ble Minister for Tribal Affairs would address
the conference which could be followed by discussions on important
points depending upon the availability of time. |
|
3.
Shri K.C. Pant, Vice-Chairman, NCP and Deputy Chairman, Planning
Commission in his inaugural address stated that the NPP 2000
made a departure from previous attempts at family planning by
widening the whole concept of population stabilization programme
to link the same with various social sector programmes concerned
with the improvement in the quality of life of the people which
again has a direct relationship with the desire for a smaller
family for giving better chances to the children in life, educating
them and having a sense of confidence about the survivability
of the child. There is no doubt that in due course as social
changes take place, education spreads, the age of marriage of
the girl goes up and more people insist on economic development,
gradually the demographic stabilization would take place gradually.
But it may not be possible for us to wait for these developments
and hence, the need for reorienting policies and programmes
of various sectors to help the process of early demographic
stabilization. |
|
We have the example of China which has been able to achieve
spectacular results in bringing down the population growth.
Though we may not exactly copy the Chinese model and though
it is important that we fashion our programmes in harmony with
democratic principles, promoting vigorously the small family
norm should form an integral part of the policies and programmes
of all social sectors because early population stabilization
would be of great help in achieving the targets and objectives
in each sector. The burgeoning population of the country is
the most important factor responsible for the prevalence of
high levels of unmet needs in various sectors of development
like health care, family welfare, education, nutrition, water
supply, sanitation, housing, etc. which in turn leads to higher
levels of human fertility. He also referred to the results of
the population Census 2001, the inter-State and intra-State
demographic differences and the tremendous progress which have
already been made since independence and stated that there are
definite indication that the country is entering a phase of
rapidly declining fertility. He gave some details of the initiatives
taken by the NCP after the first conference of the Commission
and stated that the recommendations made by the different Working
Groups and Advisory Groups formed by the NCP and the programme
of action emerging out of them would be considered in separate
meetings with the concerned Ministries at the Centre and States.
They would also be taken into consideration while formulating
the policies and programmes for the Tenth Five Year Plan. Shri
Pant stated that the presence of important Central Ministers,
Members of the Planning Commission, Members of the NCP and Secretaries
to the Government of India in today’s meeting would help
place population stabilization issues in the proper perspective
and ensure necessary coordination and cooperation between various
Departments in population stabilization efforts. |
|
Address
by Shri Jual Oram, Hon’ble Union Minister for Tribal Affairs |
|
4.
Shri Jual Oram appreciated the analytical presentations made
by different departments about the social sector programmes.
He stated that if the policies and programmes outlined in the
presentations are realized, there is no doubt that our goals
and objectives would be achieved. While emphasizing the need
for improving the statistics, he said that often hospitals are
there which do not function and school buildings are there but
no teachers to teach. We should take into account the ground
realities regarding infrastructure etc. and should not base
our plans on the jugglery of figures. Regarding the importance
of PRIs, he stated that earlier everything including marriages
and divorce etc. used to take place through PRIs. However, in
between we gave up that system. But now we are again going back
to PRIs and ISM&H system based on herbs etc. In ancient
times people could prevent the birth of more children whenever
they wanted by using local herbs and medicines. The Minister
also emphasized the need for convergence and coordination of
various programmes having a bearing on population issues. He
appreciated the initiative taken by the NCP in this direction
and hoped that we should be able to achieved the targets set
by the NPP-2000. |
|
Address
by Shri Anant Kumar, Hon’ble Union Minister for Urban
Development and Poverty Alleviation |
|
5.
Shri Anant Kumar, Hon’ble Union Minister for Urban Development
and Poverty Alleviation mentioned that the present urban population
of 28.5 crores out of total of 102 crores is close to the 1947
total population of 30 crores. He recalled that there was 16%
urban population in 1947 and hence there had been 12% increase
in urbanization since independence. Despite the population explosion,
the country has progressed during the last 50 years. Focussing
on the urban slums, the Hon’ble Minister said that there
are 75 million slum population out of 285 million urban population
and astonishingly 46% of the total slum population are living
in three mega cities, each having more than 10 million population.
The incidence of urban poverty is high in major urban cities
like Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata and Chennai and a reduction in the
urban poverty is noticed when we come to smaller cities and
towns. He mentioned that though unfortunate, the country was
having two types of development models as also some regions
of the country was having different development and delivery
models. He mentioned that the growth in population is linked
to the quality of life which depends upon basic amenities, health,
education, employment opportunities and social environment.
In this connection he referred to the Hon’ble Prime Minister’s
vision of providing shelter for all by 2010 and mentioned that
we have 200 million households in the country, out of those
33 million families were shelterless, out of which 17.74 million
families were shelterless in urban areas and the rest in rural
areas. The incidence of homelessness is more in urban areas
as compared to rural areas. Then he stated the three-fold mandate
of his ministry as follows: |
|
| • |
|
For
the first time the ministry is coming out with the National
Slum Policy with an integrated and comprehensive approach
for the development of quality of life in urban slums
having direct bearing on population explosion. He stated
that the National Slum Policy (NSP), to be presented
to the Nation before the winter session of Parliament,
would be the benchmark with all the ingredients such
as security of tenure, basic amenities, the educational
and employment opportunities, the environment and the
social infrastructure. |
| • |
|
After the announcement of the Hon’ble Prime Minister
to provide housing for all in urban areas, Rs. 1000
crore has been provided in the budget in Valmiki Ambedkar
Malin Basti Awas Yojana (VAMBAY) and Rs. 2000 crore
has been taken as loan from HUDCO. This Rs. 3000 crore
with 50% subsidy and 50% grant would be provided with
unit costs Rs. 60,000 for mega cities, Rs. 50,000 for
million plus cities and Rs. 40,000 for other urban areas.
He mentioned that this was the first ever grant based
housing scheme in the entire nation being launched by
the Hon’ble Prime Minister. He said that for the
first year sanction for construction of 4 lakh houses
would be given. The urban development Ministry along
with HUDCO will provide 3 million houses in three years.
He mentioned that in fact, money for more than 3.5 million
houses have been allocated and half of them have already
been constructed. |
| • |
|
Lastly,
he mentioned about ‘Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan’
to provide shauchalaya throughout the country. For this
programme Rs. 200 crore was taken from VAMBAY and Rs.
200 crore was provided by the HUDCO and through this
one lakh sanitary complexes could be provided across
the country. He stated that one more action programme
was required for drinking water facility which has to
be enunciated, articulated and implemented. He stated
that there should be balanced development of rural and
urban areas to tackle the problem of migration to urban
areas. The Planning Commission, Ministries of HRD, Finance,
Urban Development and Rural Development, Health &
Family Welfare, Social Welfare and Tribal Affairs should
come together to reorient, restructure and converge
their schemes for a focussed upgradation of the quality
of life and control of population. |
|
|
Address
by Dr. Murali Manohar Joshi, Union Minister, HRD |
|
6.
Dr. Murali Manohar Joshi, Hon’ble Union Minister for Human
Resource Development welcomed the initiatives of Shri K. C.
Pant relating to population stabilization, which has been his
concern for a long time. He appreciated the centred and well-focussed
presentations made by the NCP and various Ministries/Departments
and emphasized the need for programmes to reach the remote areas
and to make people aware of the policies and programmes. While
mentioning about the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan started by the Ministry
of HRD, he pointed out that unless the machinery for reaching
the programmes at the grass-root level worked properly, we would
not be able to achieve our objectives. He mentioned that there
were 100-125 schemes at the block level and it would be a very
difficult task for a Block Development Officer to monitor all
those programmes. Most of the programmes are running on paper
only. He stressed the need for proper monitoring system to check
whether the money was reaching to the level for which it had
been sanctioned and also to strengthen and energize the education
and health infrastructures at the grass-root level. Our development
model is based on reductionist approach of the western world.
We could not see problems in society in overall context. Population
problem is related to education, health and sanitation as also
health and education are related to each other and the development
of the country is related to all these factors. The highly compartmentalized
approach, dividing developmental issues into various segments,
as it is happening now, is detrimental to progress. So, we should
adopt integrated and holistic approach to synergize, coordinate
and converge all the programmes of different social sectors
to achieve better success. He said that he was happy with this
exercise of social sector coordination initiated by Shri K.
C. Pant. He gave the example of unification of Europe in the
global context and emphasized the need for all Departments to
work together to promote synergy in all developmental programmes. |
|
The Hon’ble Minister also drew attention to the problems
of ten lakh women working in Anganwadi centres. They are the
largest Mahila Shakti in the World but they used to get less
honorarium and do more work. He said that we could overcome
all problems regarding immunization, health of children, pregnant
mothers, adolescent girls, sanitation etc. if the concerned
Departments would work together. We could change the country
within five years. He said that nowadays we were accepting the
indigenous system of medicine which we used to neglect earlier.
As rightly stated by Shri Jual Oram, we must promote our indigenous
system for improving the quality of health and nutrition. He
again emphasized the need for integrated and holistic approach
for solving problems and hoped that we would get solutions to
all problems regarding population stabilization under the able
leadership of Shri K.C. Pant. |
| |
7.
On behalf of the NPC, a CD Rom presentation was made on the
demographic situation in the country, major activities of the
NCP and highlights of the recommendations made by the various
Working Groups and Advisory Groups set up by the Commission.
|
|
8.
At the request of the NCP, the District Magistrates of Jodhpur
and Faridabad attended the conference and spoke about certain
field level initiatives. These districts were among those visited
by NCP teams to understand grass-root level realities and appreciate
local initiatives. |
|
9.
Shri R.K. Mishra, DM, Jodhpur highlighted the role of women’s
Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in Jodhpur District as a possible model
for convergence of different social sector programmes. These
micro groups generally have 10 to 20 members. Because of their
honesty and transparency they exert tremendous influence on
others. The group leader is basically a facilitator. They value
their self-esteem and function on the principle of mutual aid.
They are not anti-establishment because most of them are created
by Government initiative. They also interact well with the Panchayati
Raj Institutions and other service providers. Any social programme
which is meant to give a better standard of living and security
is readily welcomed by them. Another important point is that
these groups are caste neutral, SC/ST members and non-SC/ST
members are grouped together. The most important thing is they
are ready to plan and they are ready to wait for results. The
items identified as priority for micro planning by the SHGs
were the following : |
|
i. |
|
Immunization
of children with quality and in time |
ii. |
|
Safe
delivery for pregnant women |
iii. |
|
Flexibility
in sterilization programme keeping in view crop schedule,
festivals, etc. |
iv.
|
|
Basic
medical care in the village at the sub-centre level |
v. |
|
Health
Insurance Schemes like Jan Arogaya Yojana , Rajya Rajeshwari
Yojana, etc. |
vi. |
|
Nutritional
Support twice a year for mal-nourished children and expectant
mothers. |
vii. |
|
Counseling |
|
|
He
stated that about 100 micro plans were prepared at the field
level with the help of these SHGs who themselves prepared the
list of children for immunization, suggested the schedule for
immunization camps etc. These micro plans are consolidated at
the levels of the Sub-Divisional Officer and DM and District
Health Society. This ensures synergy and provision of services
successfully. There are hundreds of women in Jodhpur District
who have done remarkable work in the field without much assistance
from the Government. A little bit of help will definitely enable
them to prepare for a better tomorrow. |
| |
10.
Shri S.C. Jain, DM, Faridabad stated that his district has witnessed
a tremendous growth in population because of the influx of migrant
labour and because of its proximity to Delhi. Dealing with the
problems of the minority dominated Mewat area of the district
visited by the NCP team he stated that there is a strong inhibition
among the minority community in this area in sending their children
to school, especially the girls even though there are sufficient
educational facilities available. The teachers are also reluctant
to go to this remote area of the district. He suggested that
education should be made compulsory for the children. Secondly,
Urdu language should be taught as a compulsory subject to attract
more students because the experience of English medium schools
in getting students is not very encouraging. Thirdly, girl students
should be given certain incentives such as scholarship, uniform,
books, etc. in order to remove the strong inhibition in sending
girls to schools. It may also be helpful if more lady teachers
are posted in these areas. Generally trained teachers manipulate
their postings in urban areas and they don’t bother to
go to rural areas. It will be useful if some sort of incentives
are given for teachers and other trained staff who are posted
in these difficult rural surroundings. A strong adult literacy
programme should also be undertaken in the locality. If the
parents are educated, they will definitely like to send their
children to the schools. |
|
Presentation
by Shri B.K. Chaturvedi, Secretary, Department of Elementary
Education and Literacy |
|
11.
The National Population Policy indicates two goals in the field
of education: |
| |
|
|
| i. |
|
make
school education upto the age of 14 free and compulsory |
| ii.
|
|
reduce
dropout rates at primary and secondary level below 20% |
|
|
Shri B.K. Chaturvedi stated that there is a co-relation between
literacy rate and population growth. Generally speaking, States
with low literacy, especially low female literacy have shown
a higher decadal growth in population. Such a relationship can
also be noticed at the district level. As regards policy intervention,
the Government has already decided to bring forward a Bill in
the coming winter session of Parliament for making education
free and compulsory for children between the age of 6 to 14
years and the Right to Education will be made a Fundamental
Right. Further, the provision of early childhood care for children
upto the age of 6 will be included among the Directive Principles
of State Policy. Provision of opportunities for education for
all children from 6 to 14 years will be made a Fundamental Duty
of the parents and guardians. Three programmes of intervention
for the Tenth Plan period are the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Mahila
Samakhya and Adult Education. The main aim of the Sarva Shiksha
Abhiyan is to make elementary education compulsory and free,
improve the quality of education, bridge the gender and social
gaps in education and eliminate the dropout of children from
schools. At present the gap between male and female literacy
is 21% at national level which is much more in rural areas.
Provision of primary school or alternative school within 1 km
of each habitation is a major objective of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan.
Training of community leaders and involving village education
committees, mother committees and parent-teacher committees
in the education programme and making special provision for
children with disabilities are other important aspects.
|
|
The
Mahila Samakhya started in 1989 is for the education and empowerment
of women from socially and educationally marginalized groups
in the rural areas. Under these programmes women discuss their
own issues and problems and decide as to what can be done to
solve them. The objective of the programme is to provide knowledge
and information to women and thereby help empower them. This
programme has been found to be very successful and it was even
applauded by the UNESCO. Under the Adult Education programme
the national literacy mission imparts functional literacy to
non-literates in the 15-35 age groups. The present objective
is to achieve full literacy, i.e., the sustainable threshold
level of 75% by 2005. The three major aspects of this programme
are total literacy, post-literacy campaigns and continuing education
by which skills are learned, those skills are protected and
all illiterates are mopped up. Interestingly, about 60% of the
learners and volunteers are women. It is also proposed to institutionalize
population concerns in adult literacy programmes through population
and development education programme. |
| |
| Presentation
by Shri P.G.D. Chakraborty, Joint Secretary, Department of Women
and Child Development |
| |
12.
Shri Chakraborty stated that 7 out of the 14 national social
demographic goals to be achieved by 2010 as outlined in the
NPP directly concerned women and children who constitute about
70.76% of the country’s population. Nearly 22 million
children are born every year in India out of which 22.5% are
born underweight. 70 in every 1000 of our children die before
completing one year. The Maternal Mortality Rate also remains
very high at 408 per one lakh of live births. 52% of women and
74% of pregnant women are anaemic. The conditions of women and
children in India are worse than those in countries like Sri
Lanka, Bangladesh, Egypt and other South Asian countries. The
NPP target of bringing down IMR below 30 per thousand live births
by 2010may not be reached by 10 major States accounting for
about 62% of the population of the country and 69% of the growth
in population. |
|
Similarly,
the target of bringing down MMR to below 100 per one lakh live
births seems to be a difficult task to achieve. Major factors
responsible for high IMR and MMR are underage marriage of girls
and consequent very large number of young mothers, too frequent
deliveries, high birth orders, inadequate RCH services and under-nutrition
of women and children. The cycle of mal-nutrition starts with
the household food insecurity and gender discrimination leading
to mal-nourished girls and mothers leading to low birth weight
children. This combined with inadequate RCH care results in
high IMR and MMR. Maternal mal-nutrition perpetuates inter-generational
mal-nutrition. The major elements of intervention strategies
are the converting the country’s food security into nutrition
security for mother and child, empowering women to have access
to resources and decision making, converge health and nutrition
related services at the grass-roots, involve community, PRIs,
SHGs and NGOs and adopt a sustained and concerted campaign in
print, electronic and folk media. He stated that the goals of
NPP 2000 should be further decomposed to annual goals for each
State and each demographically weak district. Adequate resource
allocation for achieving the goals should be ensured. A sound
system of monitoring be put in place to monitor the progress
and for mid-course corrections if necessary. |
|
Presentation
made by Ms. Sudha Pillai, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Rural
Development |
|
13
Ms. Sudha Pillai highlighted the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions
(PRIs) and Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in population stabilization.
She stated that the PRIs and SHGs should be activated to tackle
problems like universalisation of primary education, compliance
of legal age of marriage and elimination of discriminatory practices
and social mores against women. They can also generate awareness
about the availability, accessibility and affordability of health
and family welfare services. Women Panchayati Raj members should
be given special training and made key resource personnel. The
functionaries of various social sector programmes including
health and family welfare should be made accountable to elected
representatives of PRIs at different levels. The health committee
of the Gram Panchayat should be headed by a woman Panchayat
member. Registration of births, deaths, marriages and pregnancies
should be done at the village level through the PRIs. PRIs and
SHGs can also exert social and moral pressure on couples in
the reproductive age group to adopt the small healthy family
norm and to create awareness on various social issues having
a bearing on population stabilization. She also suggested that
information on demographic issues and health education should
be made available through the local languages. She further drew
attention to the recommendations made by the Task Force on Panchayati
Raj Institutions demarcating the activities and responsibilities
for different levels of PRIs such as the district, intermediate
and Gram Panchayat levels. |
|
Presentation
by Shri P.S.S. Thomas, Adviser, Planning Commission on Rural
Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation : |
|
14.
Safe drinking water and improved sanitation play a major role
in human well-being. Shri Thomas stated that water could also
be a source of spread of diseases and had a bearing on infant
mortality rate, death rate, longevity and productivity. Women
and children are particularly vulnerable to water contamination.
It is said that 70-80% of sickness are water and sanitation
related. Though much progress has been made in covering rural
areas with water supply, there are still about 19,000 not covered
and 1,60,000 partially covered habitations. In the area of sanitation
only 20% of rural people have access to sanitary latrines. There
is need for full participation of villagers and beneficiaries
in the planning design and management of water supply and sanitation
schemes. Training, education and dissemination of information
about the various issues involved can help conservation of water
resources and improving the sanitary conditions. |
|
Presentation
by Shri S. K. Naik, Secretary, Tribal Affairs: |
|
15.
Shri Naik stated that the scheduled tribes were among the weakest
sections in our society and they lived in comparative isolation
in varied ecological and geo-climatic conditions ranging from
hills to forests, inaccessible areas and plains. The tribals
did not constitute a unified group and consisted of a large
number of groups that differed from each other in socio-economic
conditions. Most tribal populations lived in remote and low-density
areas having no adequate access to basic amenities, education,
employment opportunities and affordable health care services |
|
Majority
of tribals had high levels of morbidity arising from poor nutrition,
particularly in situations where they were involuntarily displaced
or resettled. He also mentioned that they had low levels of
literacy coupled with high infant, child and maternal mortality
and hence they remained one of the major under-served population
groups in the coverage of reproductive and child health services.
The tribals also suffered from anaemia and diseases like tuberculosis,
leprosy, falciparum malaria, sickle cell disease, etc. Due to
weak government infrastructure both in terms of physical facilities
and manpower, poor means of communication, low education and
awareness levels and deep-rooted socio-cultural traditions,
earlier initiatives like area specific RCH programmes, anti
malaria programmes and implementation of Tribal Sub-Plans could
achieve only limited success. He also mentioned that there was
wide variability- regionally and between the tribes. While some
tribal communities have adopted more or less the way of life
of non-tribals at one end of the spectrum, there are 75 Primitive
Tribal Groups (PTGs) with varying population growth rates, mostly
declining. Also the health indicators of tribal populations
in North Eastern States were comparatively better than their
counterparts elsewhere in the country due to high literacy,
better awareness and utilization of available health services.
|
|
Certain
demographic parameters relating to tribals are: |
|
| • |
|
Infant
mortality is higher in tribes as compared to non-tribes
(79.8% of tribal children were anaemic and only 26%
received all vaccinations); |
• |
|
Maternal mortality is high (43.1% tribal pregnant women
did not received any antenatal check up and 37.7% did
not received any TT injections); |
•
|
|
81.1% tribal pregnant women delivered at home ( only
30% deliveries are safe); |
• |
|
Girls marrying below 18 years in tribal areas are as
high as 60%; |
• |
|
Decadal growth rate of ST population at 31.64% is higher
than that of the total population at 23.51%; |
• |
|
Many Primitive Tribal Groups have low growth rate of
population which may lead to their extinction. |
|
|
Regarding
health infrastructure, he pointed out that the norms for establishment
of sub-centres, PHCs and CHCs had been relaxed for Tribal Areas-
a sub-centre was opened for 3,000 instead of 5,000 populations;
a PHC for 20,000 instead of a norm of 30, 000 population and
a CHC for 80,000 instead of 1,20,000 population. He mentioned
that the nation-wide model was not quite relevant in respect
of many tribal regions especially for the inaccessible areas.
He suggested a flexible approach regarding population norms
as undertaken by the Department of Women and Child Development
in their ICDS Scheme in tribal areas. The following strategy
could be adopted: |
|
| • |
|
All
weather accessibility, minimum possible distance from
the residential area (should be within 3 km to access
a sub-centre) and a flexible population norm would be
more appropriate. |
| • |
|
The States have to work out the exact number of sub-centres,
PHCs, CHCs on this basis through a process of consultation
at micro level involving Panchayati Raj Institutions
and local functionaries. |
| • |
|
The
population figures of Census-2001 should be taken into
consideration and efforts should be made to fill up
the gaps. |
|
|
Following
are the strategies suggested for providing direct health services
in tribal areas: |
|
| • |
|
Village health/ delivery huts/ ethno-medicine centres
may be set up in the village to carry out routine health
activities, group meetings, IEC, deliveries etc. The
TBA or the local traditional tribal medicine practitioner
will look after these huts and refer the cases to the
village sub-centre clinics/PHC/CHC. |
| • |
|
Hold fixed day monthly clinics at the village level
(Single Window) in difficult far-flung areas, which
need to be client friendly in terms of services and
timing and to combine nutrition, sanitation, counselling,
immunization, ANC, PNC, treatment of minor ailments,
etc. |
| • |
|
Mobile
clinic to provide curative and preventive care once
a month at the sub-centre level. |
| • |
|
Wherever
the government system is remarkably deficient/inadequate,
the total responsibility of managing the delivery of
health and RCH services in a sub-centre /PHC/CHC area
may be handed over to the credible NGOs. |
|
|
While talking about the practice, utility and acceptability
of the Indian System of Medicine (ISM), Shri Naik mentioned
that there were over 6 lakh ISM & H practitioners serving
in remote rural areas and urban slums accepted by the community
and in order to improve the quality of these systems and the
efficacy of the practitioners, documentation and integration
of the ISM, particularly the tribal system of medicine was urgently
required coupled with restoration of lost practices with the
objective of improving the tribal health and nutrition. Shri
Naik also said that the tribal communities were dependant upon
indigenous system of medicine which required a regular supply
of local flora, fauna or standardized medication derived from
those and traditionally, tribes were also dependant on natural
sources for other needs such as primary an supplementary nutrition,
contraceptives and general livelihood. The Government of India
had recognized the potential of traditional medicine practices
and a ‘Medicinal Plant Board’ had been set up for
an integrated development of the medicinal plants sector and
it was expected to formalize and organize cultivation of medicinal
plants, and their collection, marketing and trade, coordinate
efforts of all the stakeholders of the sector and ensure health
for all by improving the availability of herbal products, besides
generating employment to tribals on a sustainable basis. |
|
Presentation
by Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay, Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development
& Poverty Alleviation on “Population Problem
in Urban Slums” |
|
16.
Shri S. S. Chattopadhyay, Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development
& Poverty Alleviation stated that the decadal growth rate
of population during 1991-2001 in urban areas at 31.13% was
higher than that of rural areas at 17.97%. In 2001, there were
35 million plus cities having 37.8% of urban population. The
projected figures for million plus cities in 2011 and 2021 would
be 53 and 70 respectively. The annual growth rate of slum population
is 5 to 6% whereas this figure was 2% for total population,
3% for urban population and 4% for population of large cities.
There is a direct correlation between the increase in urban
poor and increase in slum population. |
|
The
following contributory causes for slum settlements: |
| |
| • |
|
Rural push – Urban pull effect |
| • |
|
Large scale migration in search of employment, economic
opportunities & better quality of life from rural
areas to urban areas and from small towns to big cities; |
| • |
|
Concentration of urban population in one or few large
cities (Primate City Syndrome); |
| • |
|
Unauthorized squatting on marginal lands. |
|
| |
He said that the slums were often viewed as - “Eyesores”;
“ Rings of Misery”; “Creeping Cancers”.
However, the slums provide support to cities in the provision
of information services and act as reservoirs of cheap labour
and contributes a significant proportion of urban income through
the informal sector. The major problems of slum population are
lack of security of land tenure, potable drinking water, sanitation,
employment, economic opportunities, facilities for health, hygiene,
child care, education, skill acquisition, access to credit,
proximity of shelter to jobs and affordable and acceptable shelter |
|
There are two alternative approaches for rehabilitation of slum
dwellers. The first one is the in situ development of squatter
settlements through provision of drinking water supply, sanitation
facilities, waste disposal system, excess waste within the overall
settlements, strong water drainage and street electrification.
The second approach is to provide alternative sites and locations
for rehabilitation through site and service land development
schemes, core or skeletal housing and adoption of agency-oriented
approach for beneficiary-oriented approaches. In regard to security
of tenure, there is need for legislation for conferring tenure
of land/pakka households to prevent unlawful affection by landlords.
Relaxation of residential and commercial development norms pertaining
to FAR, land use reclassification and provision of external
and internal infrastructure are rather important measures which
could be taken for the development of slum areas. Shri Chattopadhyay
mentioned that along with slum development programmes, rapid
development of the rural inter-land, small and medium towns
and satellite towns is necessary to ensure balanced regional
development. Regarding financing of slum and squatter upgradation
programmes, there is need for evolving micro finance as a development
initiative for the poor and slum dwellers with special focus
on women, NGOs and Self-Help Groups can play a major role in
developing the system for channelizing and recovery of credit.
Financial institutions providing sectoral credit may have to
provide composite credit for production, consumption and housing
through a central window. He stated that the draft National
Slum Policy (NSP) on the anvil have the following objectives
: |
| |
| • |
|
Grant of tenurial rights to all residents on tenable sites
owned or acquired by Government; |
| • |
|
Full property rights on resettlements sites and |
| • |
|
Facilitating tenure on privately owned land on which tenable
slum settlements exit by acquiring those lands through
negotiations.
|
|
| |
| For
the improvement of National Slum Development Programme (NSDP),
he mentioned that the following points were being
taken into consideration: |
| |
| • |
|
Conversion of National Slum Development Programme from
Additional Central Assistance (ACA) to a Centrally Sponsored
Scheme with 100% grant in the Tenth Five Year Plan pending
with the Planning Commission. |
| • |
|
Increase in Annual Budget allocation from Rs.365.81 crore
(2000-01) to Rs.100 crores. |
| • |
|
Improving Management Information System (MIS) for better
monitoring. |
|
| |
| Shri
Chattopadhyay then stated the Valmiki-Ambedkar Malin Basti Awas
Yojana (VAMBAY) which is a new scheme for urban poor in the
slums announced by the Hon’ble Prime Minister on Independence
Day, 2001 to facilitate the construction of dwelling units annually
for Slum Dwellers through Central Subsidy of Rs.1000 crores
along with HUDCO’s loan assistance for Rs.1000 crores
(50 % subsidy: 50% loan ) which would enable construction of
4 lakh units with unit costs as Rs.60,000 for 6 Mega cities,
Rs. 45,000 for Million+ cities and Rs.40,000 for other urban
areas and the scheme is to be launched on November 1st , 2001.
Then he stated the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan -a sub-component of
VAMBAY which is the National City Sanitation Project to cover
all the State capitals and Million-plus cities with the objective
of 100% coverage for sanitation facilities for all, during the
10th Plan period and tom provide new toilets or conversion for
formal sector; Community toilet scheme for slum dwellers. This
scheme is started as a pilot project in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata,
Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh, Lucknow
and Guwahati. This scheme also covers effluents and wastes for
production of manure, vermiculture, bio-gas cogeneration etc.
|
| |
| The
presence of important Union Ministers, Members of the Planning
Commission, Members of the NCP, Secretaries to the Government
of India and presentations made by different Departments of
Government of India were useful to bring population stabilization
issues in proper perspective. The recommendations made by different
Working Groups/ Advisory Groups formed by the NCP and the programme
of action emerging out of them highlighted in the presentations
by different Departments would also be taken into consideration
while formulating the policies and programmes for the Tenth
Five Year Plan. It was felt that the programmes and policies
of various social sectors need reorientation and convergence
at the Central, State, District, Block and village levels. Private
sector participation and integration of indigenous system of
medicine is necessary for improving the quality and coverage
of health care and family welfare services. Need for proper
monitoring system was also emphasized to check whether the benefits
of the programmes were reaching the target groups. |
| |
| |
|
Annexure-
I |
LIST
OF PARTICIPANTS OF THE MEETING ON SOCIAL SECTOR CONVERGENCE
HELD ON 4TH OCTOBER 2001 IN KANISHKA HOTEL, NEW DELHI |
| |
|
|
| 1.
|
|
Shri
K. C. Pant, Dy Chairman, Planning Commission & Vice
Chairman, National Commission on Population |
| 2. |
|
Dr.
Murali Manohar Joshi, Union Minister, Human Resource Development. |
| 3. |
|
Shri
Anant Kumar, Union Minister, Urban Development & Poverty
Alleviation |
| 4. |
|
Shri
Jual Oram, Union Minister, Tribal Affairs |
| 5. |
|
Dr.
S. P. Gupta, Member, Planing Commission |
| 6. |
|
Shri
Sompal, Member, Planing Commission |
| 7. |
|
Shri
Kamaluddin Ahmed, Member, Planing Commission |
| 8. |
|
Mrs.
Margaret Alva, Member of Parliament |
| 9. |
|
Ms.
Jaya Jaitly, Member of Parliament & Member, National
Commission on Population |
| 10. |
|
Shri
Tarlochan Singh, Vice Chairman, National Minority Commission,
Member, National Commission on Population |
| 11. |
|
Shri
Kiran Karnik, President, NASSCOM |
| 12. |
|
Dr.
J.K. Jain, President, Jain TV, Member, National Commission
on Population |
| 13. |
|
Dr.
Nina Puri, FPAI, Mumbai, Member, National Commission on
Population |
| 14. |
|
Mrs.
Rami Chhabra, Member, National Commission on Population |
| 15. |
|
Dr.
R. Srinivasan, Member, National Commission on Population |
| 16. |
|
Ms.
Imrana Qadeer, Professor, JNU, Member, National Commission
on Population |
| 17. |
|
Shri
Alok Mukhopadhyayh, CEO, VHAI and Member, National Commission
on Population |
| 18. |
|
Dr.
Saroj Pachauri, Population Council, Member, National Commission
on Population |
| 19. |
|
Mrs.
Krishna Singh, Member Secretary, National Commission on
Population |
| 20. |
|
Ms.
K. Aggarwal, Principal Adviser, Planning Commission |
| 21. |
|
Shri
M.D. Asthana, Principal Adviser, Planning Commission |
| 22. |
|
Shri
A.R. Nanda, Secretary, Department of Family Welfare |
| 23.
|
|
Shri
R.V. Vaidhanatha Ayyar, Secretary, Dept. of Women and Child
Development |
| 24. |
|
Shri
S.S. Sharma, Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports |
| 25. |
|
Shri
S.S. Chattopadhyay, Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development
and Poverty Alleviation |
| 26. |
|
Shri
B.K. Chaturvedi, Secretary, Department of Elementary Education |
| 27. |
|
Shri
S.K. Naik, Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs |
| 28. |
|
Shri
Pratyush Sinha, Addl. Secretary and FA, Planning Commission |
| 29. |
|
Shri
P.S.S. Thomas, Adviser, Planning Commission |
| 30.
|
|
Dr.
Prema Ramachandran, Adviser (Health),Planning Commission |
| 31. |
|
Ms.
Firoza Mehrotra, Adviser (Admn, PC and MLP), Planning Commission |
| 32.
|
|
Dr.
Rohini Nayyar, Adviser (RD), Planning Commission |
| 33. |
|
Ms.
T.K. Sarojini, Planning Commission |
| 34. |
|
Shri
B.P. Misra, Addl. Secretary, Department of Expenditure |
| 35.
|
|
Ms.
Uma Pillai, Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Labour |
| 36. |
|
Ms.
Vineeta Rai, Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development
and Poverty Alleviation |
| 37. |
|
Shri
P.C. Rawal, Addl. Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice
and Empowerment |
| 38. |
|
Shri
V. Asokan, Joint Secretary, National Commission on Population |
| 39. |
|
Ms.
Sudha Pillai, JS, Ministry of Rural Development |
| 40. |
|
Ms.
Meenakshi Datta Ghosh, Joint Secretary (Policy), Ministry
of Health & Family Welfare |
| 41. |
|
Shri
P.G. D. Chakraborti, Joint Secretary, Dept. of Women and
Child Development |
| 42. |
|
Shri
D.K. Trehan, Economic & Statistical Advisor, Deptt of
Agriculture |
| 43.
|
|
Shri
K.V. Krishnan, Economic Adviser, Deptt of Health |
| 44.
|
|
Shri
K. Chandramouli, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Labour |
| 45. |
|
Shri
T.R. Malakar, DDG, Doordarshan |
| 46.
|
|
Shri
S. Sen, DDG, CII, New Delhi |
| 47. |
|
Dr.
Bindeshwar Pathak, Founder, Sulabh Social Service Organization |
| 48. |
|
Dr.
Padam Singh, ADG, ICMR, New Delhi |
| 49. |
|
Dr.
Kamal Taori, Inter-State Council |
| 50. |
|
Shri
J.L. Pandey, NCERT, New Delhi |
| 51. |
|
Prof.
S.C. Gulati, PRC, Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi |
| 52. |
|
Prof.
Mari Bhat, PRC, New Delhi |
| 53. |
|
Mrs.
Ranbir Gujral, Indian Nursing Council |
| 54. |
|
Shri
C.R.K. Nair, Director, Ministry of Rural Development |
| 55. |
|
Shri
S.K. Bansal, Under Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource
Development |
| 56. |
|
Shri
A.P. Nigam, JSL |
| 57. |
|
Dr.
D.K. Mangal, Representative of Government of Rajasthan |
| 58. |
|
Ms.
Valsala Kutty, Director, Deptt. Of Drinking Water Supply |
| 59. |
|
Shri
R.C. Joshi, Consultant Media, National Commission on Population
|
| 60. |
|
Shri
Arvind Pandey, Director, Institute for Research in Medical
Statistics |
| 61. |
|
Shri
K.N. Unni, Dy. Registrar General, RGI |
| 62. |
|
Dr.
V.D. Lall, Director SDS |
| 63. |
|
Dr.
Stuti Lall, Society for Development Studies |
| 64. |
|
Shri
Afzal Amanullah, Secretary, Health & Family Welfare,
Government of Bihar |
| 65. |
|
Shri
J.P. Sharma, Secretary, Health and Family Welfare, Uttar
Pradesh |
| 66. |
|
Shri
Rajat Kumar Mishra, DM, Jodhpur |
| 67.
|
|
Shri
S.C.Jain, Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad |
| 68. |
|
Shri
K.T. Gurumukhi, TCPO |
| 69. |
|
Shri
V. Suresh, CMD, HUDCO |
| 70. |
|
Dr.
C.H. S. Sastry, Deptt. Of ISM & H |
| 71. |
|
Dr.
Kaushal Kumar, UTTHAN, NGO |
| 72. |
|
Shri
Vikram Diesh, D-604, Anand Lok Society, Mayur Vihar, Phase-I,
Delhi-110091 |
| 73. |
|
Shri
K.N. Gupta, Sulabh International Social Service Organization
|
| 74.
|
|
Ms.
Abha Bahadur, Chairperson, Sulabh International Social Service
Organization |
| 75. |
|
Shri
Nagesh Singh, Director (RD), Planning Commission |
| 76. |
|
Dr.
G.L. Jambholkar, Dy. Educational Advisor (School), Ministry
of Human Resource Development |
| 77. |
|
Shri
K.P. Katailiha, Dy. Adviser, W.R. Division, Planning Commission
|
| 78. |
|
Dr.
K.K. Kapur, Haryana |
| 79. |
|
Dr.
Satish Kalara, Haryana |
| 80.
|
|
Shri
Arvind Mehta, PS to MOS (PMO and Planning) |
| 81. |
|
Dr.
N.K. Sahu, PS to Minister for Tribal Affairs, Ministry of
Tribal Affairs |
| 82.
|
|
Shri
Balram Solanki, APS, Planning Commission |
| 83.
|
|
Ms.
Moushumi Basu, Society for Development Studies |
| 84. |
|
Shri
R. K. Parmar, Under Secretary, National Commission on Population |
| 85.
|
|
Shri
Ajay Pandey, Consultant, National Commission on Population |
| 86.
|
|
Shri
C. S. Mishra, Research Officer, National Commission on Population |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|